• Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I hadn’t previously come across the printing press as an influence on witch hunts, interesting. It is pretty far down the Wikipedia article, though, and a different book printed almost two hundred years later is also cited as highly influential. I devoutly hope we are not in for two hundred years of unchecked social media and AI driven misinformation.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch_hunt

    …in 1487, Kramer published the notorious Malleus Maleficarum (lit., ‘Hammer against the Evildoers’) which, because of the newly invented printing presses, enjoyed a wide readership. It was reprinted in 14 editions by 1520 and became unduly influential in the secular courts.

    The 1647 book, The Discovery of Witches, soon became an influential legal text. The book was used in the American colonies as early as May 1647, when Margaret Jones was executed for witchcraft in Massachusetts, the first of 17 people executed for witchcraft in the Colonies from 1647 to 1663.

    • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      This is the phrase/term ‘medieval witch hunt’ is inaccurate. Witch hunts and trials didn’t start until the early modern period and didn’t reach their peak until the 17th century.

      Of course you could make the argument that despite it being ‘early modern’, most people’s mindsets were still positively medieval. There was a hell of a lot of superstition and all manner of weird crap in daily life and even in the legal system. For example, it was believed that the corpse of a murder victim could point out its murderer if the murderer interacted with the body in some way. Another thing is the belief in ‘life force’ (I forgot the term they used) for people who were murdered or executed. The reason is that since those people’s deaths were not natural, their bodies still had surplus ‘life energy’ that could be used to heal the sick or dying. Obviously that didn’t work, but it still tells you a lot about their mentality.

      Also in medicine and medical thinking, while there was steady experimenting happening in higher society, for the average person who rarely saw a ‘real’ doctor, many people were still thinking in terms of the 4 humours as late as the very early 19th century, with a lot of medical thinking being ancient, like thinking that some pastes and medicines made from worms would help to heal scars since worm bodies look a little like scars themselves.

      • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        50 minutes ago

        As late as the 19th century? Belief in “like cures like” alternate medicines is still widespread today!

        https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7253376/

        A European survey conducted in 2014 examined the use of homeopathy and other popular forms of “alternative/complementary” medicine… This survey covered 21 European countries and Israel and provided data from structured interviews with 40,185 individuals.

        …the use of homeopathy is highly prevalent (≥10%) in France, Switzerland, Germany and Austria.

        The principles of homeopathy were first introduced in 1796 by Samuel Hahnemann… One core tenet is “similia similibus curentur” (like cures like), i.e. the principle of similarity: compounds, which can produce symptoms (at high doses), can cure a disease with similar symptoms (when administered at low doses).