- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
Despite the rush to integrate powerful new models, about 5% of AI pilot programs achieve rapid revenue acceleration; the vast majority stall, delivering little to no measurable impact on P&L.
The research—based on 150 interviews with leaders, a survey of 350 employees, and an analysis of 300 public AI deployments—paints a clear divide between success stories and stalled projects.
About 90% of tech startups fail. It happens all the time because it’s in the nature of innovation.
Here anything about AI is received negatively so a 5% success rate is the “demonstration” that it’s a bubble. I’m sorry if you hope so, but it’s not. 5% is not far away from the normal failure rate of new companies and here we are talking about early adopters who buy a lottery ticket trying to be the first that makes it work.
Feel free to believe the contrary. I don’t need to convince an anonymous guy on internet.
Arguing that there’s an economic scheme threatening AI development and you translate it as “hope” that there is going to be an economy-destroying bubble burst, tells me I won’t get far in this conversation. Maybe figure out if there’s a less emotional/defensive path for looking at all this.
If you start with
you should expect to be seen as one of those with that irrational hate for a technology.
Back in topic: can this be a bubble like the dot-com? Of course. Is it? Probably not.
95% of failures should be a warning for all those fools who expects something that this technology cannot do. Nothing more than that.
So you’re one of the “some people” got it.