Each I is a finger, V is the thumb and index. X is crossing your index and middle finger.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    IV and IX don’t make sense when it could be done more intuitively by IIII and VIIII.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sure, but OP is talking about fingers as representation, not markings. Your point is exactly why they did it in writing.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        I see what you’re saying, using one hand for the entire sequence. XI is still a pain. The real problem is that there is no mention of doing this in any Roman text. A bit of an omission, or was it a state secret?