• surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    There was already a significant enough faction of republicans opposing that it required democrats to pass each of these, which was what you asked for and what you got. And now, as expected, you’ve got plenty of excuses.

    Everyone mark this astroturf bot in your apps. We got another liberal here pretending to be a pragmatic leftist with a DNC dick in their mouth.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nope, I looked up the vote numbers by party. Both federal bills outside of the crypto required no Democrats support. It’s just reported that way in those articles because they want to point out that their are shit Democrats.

      The North Carolina budget I know nothing about, what they spend money on in their state really has nothing to do with the federal governments agenda.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Anti-trans NDAA: house republicans were 20 votes short of a majority.

        Laken Riley act: house republicans were 44 votes short of a majority senate republicans 11 votes short.

        March ‘25 spending bill: senate republicans 8 votes short.