I made the unfortunate post about asking why people liked Arch so much (RIP my inbox I’m learning a lot from the comments) But, what is the best distro for each reason?

  • Tywèle [she|her]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    48 minutes ago

    I use Fedora. I like that it’s very up to date and that it doesn’t change the GNOME defaults. It also has a big community and many resources to look into if anything goes wrong.

  • StarMerchant938@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Not very exciting or interesting but I prefer xubuntu. All the things I need from mainline Ubuntu, none of the things I don’t.

  • nyan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Gentoo works best for me because I’m a control freak. It lets me tune my system in any way I want, and I don’t mind leaving my computer on while I’m asleep so that it can compile its way through libreoffice, webkit, and a couple of browsers. Plus, based on complaints I hear from people using other distros, Portage beats other package managers in every way except speed.

    This doesn’t mean that it’s best for everyone, mind you, just that it’s best for me.

  • jjba23@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    With Guix you have reproducibility, freedom, good docs and peace of mind, also when configuring things more deeply. You also have a powerful programming language (Scheme / Lisp) with which to define your system config as well as your dotfiles. This is my insight after years of GNU/Linux usage. I run Guix on laptops, desktops and servers, and I never have configuration drift, as well as the benefit that I have a self documenting system.

    https://codeberg.org/jjba23/sss

  • LumpyPancakes@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Debian.

    With x11 gnome it can run the Rustdesk client and pass all the keys properly to the Windows host. And it doesn’t boot to a black screen like many other distros on my Asus laptop.

    Was on Fedora with similar results but it started taking ages to boot looking for a non existent tpm chip.

  • asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Arch. I tried other distros and always came back to Arch. Other distros are very bloated and honestly I can’t be bothered with removing them manually. I also love the AUR and the wiki.

    Another interesting distro was NixOS, but that is a bit of a pain in the ass to learn.

    For newbies, Fedora KDE Plasma edition or Mint Cinnamon is my recommendation. Kinoite is Fedora KDE Plasma edition but immutable for the ones that keep breaking the system because they keep following some absurd guide online for whatever.

  • Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    ZorinOS is the best for me, because it works out of the box, looks a lot like Windows which i’m used to, is relatively configurable and is free (the paid version is just cosmetics and prebundled additional software). I consider looking into Arch though, thanks to your post and the comments there ;)

  • I use fedora silverblue for a couple reasons. After jumping from elementary to Ubuntu to Manjaro to Artix I got tired of dealing with distro specific modifications and weird issues. With the Ubuntu based distro I never enjoyed how out of date some packages were. I’d hear about a cool new update for a program I use and realize it would be a while till that would be in my repos.

    I really liked artix and Arch’s rolling release nature and I would probably enjoy arch if I still used my computer daily like I used to but now I can be away from it for a couple months at a time and I need updates to be stable.

    I’ve found Fedora (silverblue in particular) to be a perfect middle ground between rolling release and having a more regular update schedule. I use silverblue because I never wanted to have to worry about an update breaking my install ever again.

    I will admit that because silverblue uses flatpaks almost exclusively, my appreciation for software being up to date could be achieved on almost any other distro, but the vanilla style of fedora is what keeps me now. I’m a big fan of vanilla gnome and not too many distros ship it like that.

  • WILSOOON@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Arch is the best, the arch wiki is massive, pacman is just amazing, no nvidia drivers bullshitting, and rolling release has only broken one thing once, life under the arch is pretty great

  • mat@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I (maybe) ended distrohopping last year when I gave NixOS a shot. I can’t recommend it for beginners but once you understand generally how things work on Linux (and have an interest in programming) it’s a superpower to be able to define your entire setup as a single git repository. If something ever breaks, I can reboot into an older commit and keep using my computer, or branch off in a different direction… I’ve only scratched the surface of NixOS and yet I can already make a live USB containing my setup with a single command, or deploy it (“infect”) to another machine and manage e.g my work desktop and my personal laptop sharing most settings. Also it taught me about Nix (the package manager, which also runs on any distro and macOS independent of NixOS) which I now use to set up perfect development environments for each of my projects… if I set up dependencies once (as a flake.nix shell), it’ll work forever and anywhere.

    • a14o@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      Same for me. I distro-hopped for about 20 years with OpenSuse, Ubuntu, Debian, Arch and Fedora being the most memorable desktop setups for me. While all that was a valuable experience, NixOS feels like graduation.

      For the Nix-curious: I wish someone would have told me not to bother with the classic config and build a flake-based system immediately. They’re “experimental” in name only, very stable and super useful in practice.

  • yaroto98@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Garuda - all the benefits of arch with an easy installer. And it’s prettier (in my opinion) than EndeavorOS. Gaming is pretty great.

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Mine is the best for me because I like it the best. It does what I need with a minimum of configuration or customization. My needs and preferences are probably different from yours though, so Linux Mint Debian Edition with Cinnamon desktop environment might not be the best for you.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Mint. It just works and Cinnamon is a good DE (ui design peaked in the Windows XP days). Plus you also get all the software built and tested for Ubuntu without the bullshit of using Ubuntu.

    For my server I use NixOS, because having one unified configuration is so nice.

  • Fecundpossum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    EndeavourOS Bcause:

    It’s Arch with an easy installer, with all of the most common administration tools already installed

    With the Arch repo, AUR, and flatpak I have a wide breadth of software to choose from

    I can easily install it without a desktop environment to install and set up Hyprland without the clutter of another DE

    Not to mention it’s active and friendly community and excellent documentation