cm0002@lemmy.world to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 4 days agoJeremy Corbyn confirms new ‘socialist alternative’ before next election to fight Starmerwww.thelondoneconomic.comexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up166arrow-down11
arrow-up165arrow-down1external-linkJeremy Corbyn confirms new ‘socialist alternative’ before next election to fight Starmerwww.thelondoneconomic.comcm0002@lemmy.world to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squareohulancutash@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·4 days ago Tories: Leader dependent. Austerity fatigue. Watered down reform. In a fundraising rut. Lib Dems: Memeable but no-one actually knows what they are about. SNP: Losing ground to Starmer’s Labour anyway. Greens: Still the impression of a single-issue party. A few bizarre policies too. Reform: Have the man, have the PR machine, have the whipping-boy. Weakness in candidate vetting may limit seats contested.
minus-square1rre@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·4 days agoThe Greens also have a terrible name, they’re a left wing party that don’t particularly care about environmental issues. Meanwhile the Lib Dems just stand for whatever the government doesn’t, which changes depending on who’s in power.
Tories: Leader dependent. Austerity fatigue. Watered down reform. In a fundraising rut.
Lib Dems: Memeable but no-one actually knows what they are about.
SNP: Losing ground to Starmer’s Labour anyway.
Greens: Still the impression of a single-issue party. A few bizarre policies too.
Reform: Have the man, have the PR machine, have the whipping-boy. Weakness in candidate vetting may limit seats contested.
The Greens also have a terrible name, they’re a left wing party that don’t particularly care about environmental issues. Meanwhile the Lib Dems just stand for whatever the government doesn’t, which changes depending on who’s in power.