• mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean yeah, they always know.

      The question is how invovled were they in the attack itself (logistics, access to US surveillance, planning, etc.)

      Trump seems to be implying this is “off hands” like he stopped engaging the Houthis in the red sea a while back.

      I wonder if this is Netanyahu thrashing a bit in an effort to keep the US invovled, or the US proxying an Iranian attack with more plausible deniability.

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        US proxying an Iranian attack with more plausible deniability.

        Why does the US care about that aspect. If the US wanted to it could directly attack Iran, and the only thing China or Russia would do is “tsk-tsk” the US. No one is going to bat for Iran, especially against the US.

        • str82L @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Maybe because Trump claimed to be anti war when campaigning? Not that he ever seems to give a shit about being hypocritical.