If you’re using linux and also use brew package manager on your machine, what is your use case? I’m curious why people would use brew in addition to their distribution’s native package manager.
whoever says
pacman
is enough either have all the time in the Universe to configure the miniscule knobs or have never done serious development with multi-platform/compiler deployments. controlling which compilers are used for which packages inpacman
(or any other default package manager for that matter) is a headache. having multiple versions of non-conflictinggcc
,llvm
,cuda
etc is priceless and very easy with brew.elitism aside,
brew
is genuinely a good package manager when it comes to imperative ones. I still use it on my desktoparch
extensively. ofc, if you have nix, there is really no good reason for it (and I’m not even sure it’s possible).PS. “but you can use docker” – not if you want to have the same performance especially on GPUs. also have you ever tried containerizing HIP? it’s a frigging nightmare.
PPS. if you disagree with the first paragraph – please reach out or send links. i’d love to learn how to do these on finite timescales of our lifetime.
No, we already have a package manager.
I am using an atomic distribution (uBlue) and installing packages with homebrew is much more convenient than overlaying them with
rpm-ostree
.I’m using it on Ubuntu and Debian on WSL - I have a Windows 11 laptop at my job, but I do most of my work on linux, so I chose to use Ubuntu and Debian, but I needed some packages that are not up to date with the native package manager, so I went with brew and I can say it’s very good!
and stupid people are downvoting me for what? because I told my use case? fucking idiots!
Well a comment like this will not help in your case, calling people idiots is not nice. Most on Linux sub don’t like Windows, you should expect this. No need to get furious about random internet points. I also don’t like Windows, but wish you best luck with it. At least you are using Linux on it. Just ignore people who hate YOU for that.
Because, WSL is not a proper way to use / run Linux.
It absolutely is. WSL literally runs Linux in a virtual machine.
I did a few times on bazzite. But it’s now aurora. Haven’t had anything I was missing. Was also exporting a few things from arch in distrobox. Was more of a experiment then a necessity.
OF COURSE there has to be yet another package manager I didn’t know about on top of the dozen other ones… 😑