• faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It was this:

    Someone seeing a banal object, devoid of story and history and just merely existing, and then succumbing to emotions over loose connections to human characteristics is what I don’t relate to.

    Seeing creativity as “succumbing to emotions” sounds like you think its a bad thing that your parents told you not to do.

    • Squorlple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I mean I guess that’s sort of the point I’m stuck on. The situations I’m describing, such as in the post we’re on, are that which I cannot see as creative or active. They seem passive and overwhelming and able to genuinely convince someone of that which is clearly not there. They are of the imagination, yes, but they seem to rely on some form of unprompted and willful cognitive dissonance.

      • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Do you have unprompted creativity in other areas?

        Like, I struggle with traditional writing, but I make miniature dioramas. It’s occasionally unprompted; I recently bought frozen shrimp and thought the lid was sorta window-shaped, so now I’m making it into a window seat for a 1:12 scale treehouse library diorama. I wasn’t planning the diorama first, the whole scene came to mind unbidden, and now I’m making it.

        I feel like it’s the same thing as what you’re describing, but I don’t know if you see it as different or not.