• pebbles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I’ve only been to Venice out of the two and I very much disliked Venice. So Vegas must be pretty bad.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Hundreds of years of history, beautiful museums, best restaurants in the world, going to dinner in a vaporetto, horrible.

      Maybe Vegas is for you.

      • pebbles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’m not really a gambler. Glad you like Venice. I’ll give a list to counter:

        Claustrophobic, terrible smell, rarely air conditioned, hard to find food that isnt just carbs and fat.

        The museums are cool though.

              • pebbles@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 hours ago

                I enjoyed Rome and rural Italy. I just didn’t mesh with Venice. Idk what to tell you. It was a bad experience for me.

                Also we’re both on Lemmy so we likely both have our reasons for avoiding companies like McDonald’s.

                • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  Went to Italy for the first time last year and had a similar experience with Venice. The food was much better in rural Tuscany. Venice was crazy packed with tourists compared to Florence and Rome.

                  I was surprised there weren’t more people in Rome for jubilee, especially with the events going on that week. Though admittedly, I stayed away from the Vatican for that reason.