He had two options. Allow new data centers to be built or put a moratorium on new data centers. If you’re mad that he chose the latter, then you support the former. If I’m missing something, please give me the thought process.
Maybe you can say more can be built with documentation of proper power sourcing, noise damping, permits, etc. But it wouldn’t be well received here. People would just say that the state is okay with it and just wants their cut. Plus at the end of the day, its just another data center owned my monstrously wealthy individuals. The upfront cost, hard/software complexity, and the economy of scale for data ensures that there is no mom and pop data centers. So competition within the space is already minimal.
He had two options. Allow new data centers to be built or put a moratorium on new data centers. If you’re mad that he chose the latter, then you support the former. If I’m missing something, please give me the thought process.
Maybe you can say more can be built with documentation of proper power sourcing, noise damping, permits, etc. But it wouldn’t be well received here. People would just say that the state is okay with it and just wants their cut. Plus at the end of the day, its just another data center owned my monstrously wealthy individuals. The upfront cost, hard/software complexity, and the economy of scale for data ensures that there is no mom and pop data centers. So competition within the space is already minimal.
Nope.
You keep saying untrue things, then going off on tangents based on the flawed premise.
It’s just wasting your time because there’s no reason for anyone to read further
Oh don’t be like that. I specifically asked you to provide a rebuttal if I was ignorant to something. 🙄
Then you should try asking someone what they would do instead of building atrawmans all day.
Ask someone else tho
Sure thing mister criticize but provide no insightful alternative.
Literally anyone else reading this, do you mind filling me in since givesomefucks can’t be bothered?