• Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    That didn’t answer the question you replied to, and didn’t actually say anything. What does that all look like in real world terms in your mind? How does this “compromise” manifest? I’m guessing that it involves putting trans folk in harms way…

    • HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      You asked “What is there to compronise” and i answered “an example of compromise would be to acknowledge that trans women are biologically different from cis women”…

      Its called agreeing to disagee, have civil discussions with people who you might actually find you have more in common with then you disagree on and minds can be moved that way.

      This whole all or nothing approach is just turning more people away, you want to talk about putting trans folk in harms way, but what happend to just wanting to be able to live a normal life?

      I guess when you are in your own bubble its hard to see other perpectives, but surely you dont honestly think if you surveyed a random set of a few hundred people, the majority of them would not be on the same page about any trans rights issues, insulting or chastising them wont win them over and will only cause more resentment against trans people.

      • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 minutes ago

        Literally no one thinks cis women and trans women are the same, so your compromise doesn’t mean anything in and of itself.

        I’m asking you what your position means in real work terms. What are the consequences of these differences? Because that’s what really matters.

        Feigned outrage because I asked you for specifics seems counter to your stated goals of reaching compromise and makes me question your motives.