That’s not entirely true, it doesn’t make it FOSS.
Vibe coders sign a contract when they use AI to generate stuff, which gives rights away to the company. Regardless of copyright protections from the state, a contract is in most cases legally binding.
Copyright law requires human authorship as opposed to random generation. This doesn’t inherently exclude all generative works, algorithms that were carefully crafted and datasets curated can potentially have their results considered “authored” but the AI Company owners that made them.
In order to make it true we need to pass laws that regulate the AI companies and their slop. In the meantime, I recommend nobody uses slop code. Actually, I’d recommend that regardless of ownership rights.
Ah yes, that model. Of course. You’re right. I would know because I have read the details for every model in existence and can clearly infer which one you’re talking about. Yes.
There’s lots of open source models you can download from Hugging Face, Ollama, and even github without signing any contracts or terms of use. Gemma3, Llama, Ministral, GLM, olmo, and a bajillion others. GLM-4.7-Flash is a very capable agentic model that can run at very usable speeds on commodity hardware - and none of what it generates is dictated by any agreements or policies agreed to anywhere.
Interestingly, none of the official sources for the model weights clickwrap the download in a way that forces the user to read or agree to those terms before downloading. There is precedent for such terms being unenforceable when the user isn’t forced to agree to the terms.
That’s not entirely true, it doesn’t make it FOSS.
Vibe coders sign a contract when they use AI to generate stuff, which gives rights away to the company. Regardless of copyright protections from the state, a contract is in most cases legally binding.
Copyright law requires human authorship as opposed to random generation. This doesn’t inherently exclude all generative works, algorithms that were carefully crafted and datasets curated can potentially have their results considered “authored” but the AI Company owners that made them.
In order to make it true we need to pass laws that regulate the AI companies and their slop. In the meantime, I recommend nobody uses slop code. Actually, I’d recommend that regardless of ownership rights.
I signed no contracts to download the open source local models I use for code generation, just for what it’s worth
Ah yes, that model. Of course. You’re right. I would know because I have read the details for every model in existence and can clearly infer which one you’re talking about. Yes.
There’s lots of open source models you can download from Hugging Face, Ollama, and even github without signing any contracts or terms of use. Gemma3, Llama, Ministral, GLM, olmo, and a bajillion others. GLM-4.7-Flash is a very capable agentic model that can run at very usable speeds on commodity hardware - and none of what it generates is dictated by any agreements or policies agreed to anywhere.
https://ai.google.dev/gemma/terms
You agreed to these terms when you downloaded Gemma3 from an official source and if you did not then you’re an unlicensed user AKA piracy.
Interestingly, none of the official sources for the model weights clickwrap the download in a way that forces the user to read or agree to those terms before downloading. There is precedent for such terms being unenforceable when the user isn’t forced to agree to the terms.