maxint@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoGit without a forgewww.chiark.greenend.org.ukexternal-linkmessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up147arrow-down15cross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
arrow-up142arrow-down1external-linkGit without a forgewww.chiark.greenend.org.ukmaxint@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square54fedilinkcross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
minus-squarerhabarba@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2 days agoMercurial is decentralised, there is no single “source of truth”. (Not counting “upstream”, of course.)
minus-squaremesa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoHuh interesting, maybe it was the way we used it 15-20+ years ago or maybe it changed. No clue. But yes you are correct.
minus-squarerhabarba@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·2 days agoBoth Mercurial and Git started around the same time as a replacement for BitKeeper - which also was decentralised.
Mercurial is decentralised, there is no single “source of truth”. (Not counting “upstream”, of course.)
Huh interesting, maybe it was the way we used it 15-20+ years ago or maybe it changed. No clue. But yes you are correct.
Both Mercurial and Git started around the same time as a replacement for BitKeeper - which also was decentralised.