• taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes, I was about to say the same thing until I saw your comment. I had a little bit of success learning a few tricks with o3 but trying to use o4 is a tremendous headache for coding.

    There might be some utility in dialing it all back so it’s more straight to what I need based more on package documentation than random redditor suggestion amalgamation.

    • hansolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, I think that workarounds with o3 is where we’re at until Altman figures out that just saying the latest oX mini high is “great at coding” is bad marketing when it can’t accomplish the task.

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I don’t quite understand why o3 for coding? Do you mean for code architecture or something? Like creating apps? Why not use a better model if its for coding?

        • hansolo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          That’s exactly the problem.

          However, o4 is actually “o4 mini-high” while o3 is now just o3 now. The full release, no “mini” or other limitations. At this point o3 in its full form is better than a limited o4.

          But, none of that matters while Claude 3.7 exists.