• skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m glad we’re seeing more theatrical re-releases these days. About 42 weeks of the year there’s no new releases worth watching, so why not have something good on even if it is old.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think it should be legally mandated that each studio only re-release older movies for one month out of the year. They can stagger their months or do them all the same month, but either way we could all benefit.

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sounds nice, but they’d definitely find some way of gaming the rules so that it ended up going to shit as a concept.

        The kinds of people running Amazon-MGM-Paramount-Skydance-Disney-Blackrock-StateStreet-Vanguard are the sort of psychopaths that would deliberately sabotage it just to teach those pesky legislators a lesson about trying to tell them what to do.

        Maybe a better idea would be to add public screening of movies over 30 years old under Fair Use, and require studios to share their movies with a copyright library in order to maintain copyright protection for streaming/dvd so that they can’t just DRM the thing itself.

        Always seemed insane to me that copyright terms have been extended to the stage where the only people making a profit off a work are people who had nothing to do with its creation.