very_well_lost@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 days agoDuckDuckGo poll says 90% responders don't want AIwww.pcworld.comexternal-linkmessage-square166fedilinkarrow-up1185arrow-down11
arrow-up1184arrow-down1external-linkDuckDuckGo poll says 90% responders don't want AIwww.pcworld.comvery_well_lost@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 days agomessage-square166fedilink
minus-squarethegoodyinthehoody@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down2·9 days agoAs much as I agree with this poll, duck duck go is a very self selecting audience. The number doesn’t actually mean much statistically. If the general public knew that “AI” is much closer to predictive text than intelligence they might be more wary of it
minus-squareikirin@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 days agoI mean you Gotta Hand it to “Ai” - it is very sophisticated, and Ressource intensive predicitive Text.
minus-squareslappyfuck@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·9 days agoThere was no implication that this was a general poll designed to demonstrate the general public’s attitudes. I’m not sure why you mentioned this.
minus-squareLightfire228@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·9 days agoBecause that’s how most people implicitly frame headlines like this one: a generalization of the public
As much as I agree with this poll, duck duck go is a very self selecting audience. The number doesn’t actually mean much statistically.
If the general public knew that “AI” is much closer to predictive text than intelligence they might be more wary of it
I mean you Gotta Hand it to “Ai” - it is very sophisticated, and Ressource intensive predicitive Text.
There was no implication that this was a general poll designed to demonstrate the general public’s attitudes. I’m not sure why you mentioned this.
Because that’s how most people implicitly frame headlines like this one: a generalization of the public