I don’t know about that. She implies that Trump wants to resolve this without taking over Greenland, that this could be about security, that the US is an ally, and that the US won’t get richer from a takeover.
Absolutely disagree. This calls out the stupidity and collateral consequences of Trump’s Greenland course. It is probably not adressed at Trump but his secretaries, generals and the republicans in congress and senate.
I think they know this. They’ve supported his policies so far. I’m pretty sure they’re salivating at the money they’ll make from Greenland’s natural resources. They don’t give a shit about the collateral pain for the average American, let along European. If they did, they wouldn’t have supported Trump’s tariffs for example. Republican reps can stop Trump at any time if they wanted to.
I don’t know about that. She implies that Trump wants to resolve this without taking over Greenland, that this could be about security, that the US is an ally, and that the US won’t get richer from a takeover.
Absolutely disagree. This calls out the stupidity and collateral consequences of Trump’s Greenland course. It is probably not adressed at Trump but his secretaries, generals and the republicans in congress and senate.
I think they know this. They’ve supported his policies so far. I’m pretty sure they’re salivating at the money they’ll make from Greenland’s natural resources. They don’t give a shit about the collateral pain for the average American, let along European. If they did, they wouldn’t have supported Trump’s tariffs for example. Republican reps can stop Trump at any time if they wanted to.
And yet, even well known things have to be stated explicitly. That doesn’t mean Kaja Kallas say anything you claim her to say.
You must not be very good at reading.
If my insult is not on point, I’d like to know why. Otherwise I’ll assume you’re another troll I should block.
Clarify or not.
WTF
Guess you won’t clarify.