Archived version

While Brussels champions policy initiatives and American tech giants market their own ‘sovereign’ solutions, a handful of public authorities in Austria, Germany, and France, alongside the International Criminal Court in The Hague, are taking concrete steps to regain control over their IT.

These cases provide a potential blueprint for a continent grappling with its technological autonomy, while simultaneously revealing the deep-seated legal and commercial challenges that make true independence so difficult to achieve.

The core of the problem lies in a direct and irreconcilable legal conflict. The US CLOUD Act of 2018 allows American authorities to compel US-based technology companies to provide requested data, regardless of where that data is stored globally. This places European organizations in a precarious position, as it directly clashes with Europe’s own stringent privacy regulation, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

  • whaleross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sweden is not. Our tax office decided only this year to migrate everything to the Office 365 cloud despite Microsoft admitting that they’d turn over any data to the US government should they be asked to. I think the EU should step in on this.

    • Classy Hatter@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Finland moved election vote count system to Amazon’s cloud service. Votes are still given on paper, but the results are counted on AWS’ servers, which theoretically gives Amazon the possibility to affect our election results from here on out.

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The Dutch tax agency did the same, mostly because there are supposedly no sufficiently capable European alternatives.
      (Worth specifying that it’s specifically about the Office 365 suite, and not the software for handling tax returns)

      • Bunbury@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        And don’t forget that the Dutch digital ID was outsourced to a Dutch company that was now bought by a US company. The Dutch way for the government to digitally identify Dutch citizens is about to be in US hands.

        • Humanius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Afaik Solvinity, the company that takes care of he infrastructure behind DigiD and MijnOverheid, is on the verge of being bought by the US company Kyndryl. But it hasn’t been sold yet.

          Hypothetically the government could still stop it on the grounds of national interest. Though you can see how well that went with Nexperia…
          With the government being “demissionair” however, idk if they will.

          It would certainly draw the attention of America is we did.

          • Bunbury@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Ah, I wasn’t aware that it wasn’t 100% done yet. Shame that I have 0 trust that they’ll do anything about this.

    • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Can you just stop filing taxes because you don’t wanna violate EU data protection laws? /s

      • pmk@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        Filing taxes in sweden means going to the tax agencys website, identifying with your phone, and they already have everything pre-calculated so you just sign it digitally, takes 5 minutes. If you ignore it I think it’s the same as accepting it after a certain date.

        • Lysol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          To elaborate a bit more: the only reason to not just signing directly is if you want to declare things like “I have commuted this distance this year and want a tax cut on my commute” or other special case things you might apply for. Or if you have a small business or something. So for like 75 %, simply just signing the pre-filled tax is enough.

        • Matty Roses@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Spain has the same - but getting the signature to work on Linux isn’t too easy.

          Fixing things like that - demanding that government services are accessible by open and free software - is a major step.

      • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        No Swedish governement agency can freely choose a technical solution. Almost all such choises fall under a public procurement, which are heavily regulated. They can demand that the service supports certain things to exclude actors, but if too strict I think the procurement can be overturned. In some cases a US actor can just offer a low enough price and the agency more or less have to pick them.

        • Mad_Punda@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I feel like ”adhering to GDPR and not sharing personal information of citizens with actors outside the EU” would be a reasonable requirement. But I’m not lobbied by big tech so what do I know.