Clair Obscur won multiple awards but used generative AI art as placeholders during production.

The Indie Game Awards revoked Clair Obscur’s Debut and Game of the Year after the AI disclosure.

IGAs reassigned the awards (Blue Prince, Sorry We’re Closed) and reignited debate on gen-AI use.

  • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Yes it’s their rule. It’s a stupid rule.

    But how do they intend to police said rule in the future? Since it clearly isn’t just for released art assets but THE WHOLE PROCESS.

    If it’s just self reported what’s the point?

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      that’s all irrelevant though… the rule is the rule and they got caught

      people should be allowed to have awards for games which only use humans, and if a game is caught cheating they should be disqualified

      if they want to compete for some awards, these aren’t the awards for them: there are others

      • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yes yes. They used AI, they lost the award. I’m over it. Next topic:

        How do they (indie awards) enforce this in the future? Please read, understand and explain:

        The rules say no AI can be used in ANY stage of the development for ANYTHING. How do they check it? Where do they draw the line? Is it just art assets? Voices? Code?