• 0ops@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    2 days ago

    Remember when we used to joke about how politicians should wear their sponsors proudly like a racecar driver? Remember when that was just satire?

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hell, remember between 2003 to 2007 when the DNC had effectively banned money from politics? Remember the SCOTUS striking it down?

      • adminofoz@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        At first, I thought this was satire. I still don’t believe it, but I am willing to be persuaded by new information. Do you or anyone who knows much about this have links or even the name of the legislation?

          • adminofoz@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Im with you on Citizens United being a nightmare but if I understand your argument and your chart you are saying 100s of millions per election to politicians equals “banned money in politics.” Is that correct?

            If so I dont believe we mean the same thing when we say those words.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              24 hours ago

              It banned PACs and Corporations from spending on and engaging with campaigns, so yes, it removed money from politics.

              Would the world not be so much better without oil companies and AIPAC running elections?

              • adminofoz@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                23 hours ago

                I agree with you on banning PACs and corps from spending on and engaging in campaigns.

                My point is you aren’t going far enough. If you think $100 million spent for a candidate in 2002 is an ideal worth striving for or somehow equal to no money in politics, you are in for disappointment or you don’t remember that era well enough.

                This still nearly entirely excluded normal people from becoming a candidate. Corporations were still writing our laws during that time through lobbying. Not to mention a dozen other in roads for money in politics during that era, such as insider trading.