Key Points and Summary – Dr. Ted Galen Carpenter argues the Trump administration is inflating Venezuela into a major U.S. security threat to justify forceful actions at sea and possible regime change. -He says Caracas is not a central player in fentanyl trafficking, and Washington has not sought congressional authorization, turning the campaign into another […]

The Trump administration continues to insist that Venezuela’s leftist government poses a serious national security threat. United States officials especially assert that Nicolas Maduro’s regime is deeply involved in the illegal drug trade coming into the United States, including the surge in fentanyl in recent years. Indeed, Trump and his associates maintain that Venezuela’s government is little more than a disguised drug cartel. Washington has invoked the argument to justify an escalating series of attacks on small boats, including fishing vessels, in waters near that country.

Contending that illegal drug trafficking constitutes a national security threat sufficiently serious enough to warrant using the US military against a sovereign country is a dubious argument. Moreover, Venezuela is not a major player in the fentanyl trade.

Unfortunately, threat inflation is nothing new. Three pro-war administrations managed to obtain sufficient support from Congress and the public for military action against tiny, distant North Vietnam, based on the absurd notion that it posed a security threat to the United States. Several recent White House occupants have engaged in similar threat inflation, with respect, to justify wars against designated US adversaries.

  • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
    2·
    4 hours ago

    I mean, who do I vote for if I want the country to learn from history and hold all of our war criminals and torturers and traitors accountable? Obama didn’t hold anyone in Bush’s administration accountable like he should have, Biden appointed Garland to make sure Republicans would be protected (and, like, he’d been mister forget and forgive going all the way back to Strom Thurmond), etc. This country desperately needs to reckon with its history, but there are no influential voices in either party really interested in doing that.

    e; Yeah, just had to double check but both Hillary and Joe voted for war with Iraq in 2002. If we learned anything from history scumbags like that couldn’t get a volunteer position with their local United Way, let alone be presidential nominees.