resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoNY Times’ David Brooks Said There’s Too Much Focus on Jeffrey Epstein. Here He Is Hanging With Epstein.theintercept.comexternal-linkmessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1666arrow-down113file-textcross-posted to: usa@lemmy.mlusa@midwest.social
arrow-up1653arrow-down1external-linkNY Times’ David Brooks Said There’s Too Much Focus on Jeffrey Epstein. Here He Is Hanging With Epstein.theintercept.comresipsaloquitur@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square58fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: usa@lemmy.mlusa@midwest.social
minus-squareP03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoI mean, Michael Wolff is out there, with plenty of email evidence that he was a hack “journalist” that was practically a PR agent for Epstein. Why attack Brooks?
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-21 day ago? Por que no los dos ? Brooks is a notorious hack who built his career shilling for neoconservative policies from the Weekly Standard to the NYT to PBS. But that social circuit ran through Florida and Texas, rather than New York and London. He’s likely just tighter with a different group of pedophiles.
I mean, Michael Wolff is out there, with plenty of email evidence that he was a hack “journalist” that was practically a PR agent for Epstein. Why attack Brooks?
? Por que no los dos ?
Brooks is a notorious hack who built his career shilling for neoconservative policies from the Weekly Standard to the NYT to PBS.
But that social circuit ran through Florida and Texas, rather than New York and London. He’s likely just tighter with a different group of pedophiles.