• tatterdemalion@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sorry, I love Rust but I can’t really agree with you here. They only showed a macro_rules! definition, which is definitely rust syntax. Lifetime annotations are relatively common.

    I will concede that loop labels are incredibly rare though.

      • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I guess I see what you mean if we want to get very technical about what a syntax extension is. But I think for the purpose of this discussion, it’s reasonable to think of macro_rules! as a part of the Rust language. Practically speaking, it is syntax provided by the language team, not just users of the language who are free to extend the syntax by using macro_rules! to do so.

    • fruitcantfly@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Loop labels are rare, but they lead to much simpler/clearer code when you need them. Consider how you would implement this kind of loop in a language without loop variables:

      'outer: while (...) {
          'inner: while (...) {
              if (...) {
                  // this breaks out of the outer loop, not just the inner loop
                  break 'outer;
              }
          }
      
          // some code here
      }
      

      In C/C++ you’d need to do something like

      bool condition = false;
      while (...) {
          while (...) {
              if (...) {
                  condition = true;
                  break;
              }
          }
          if (condition) {
              break;
          }
      
          // some code here
      }
      

      Personally, I wouldn’t call it ugly, either, but that’s mostly a matter of taste

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Well, you’d typically put the loops into a function and then do an explicit return to jump out of there. I believe, there’s some use-cases where this isn’t possible, which is why I’m cool with loop labels existing, but I’ve been coding Rust for seven years and have not needed them once…