• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Words and context

    And from these basic parts we derive all language.

    While engaging with you here, the discussion has never been anything other than about my criticism of your behavior. I have never expressed an opinion of you beyond your behavior being that of a redditor (and criticisms of it stemming therefrom). Neither were my initial criticisms “baseless” - you confirmed they were completely accurate yourself. The focus has not increased, nor has there been an opportunity for you to guide me back on topic, because I have never departed from this topic - despite you repeatedly presenting new topics, which I have not engaged with as they are not relevant.

    If you take a recounting of your behavior as somehow an expression of an opinion, I would suggest you modify your behavior so that when presented with it you do not feel the need to be defensive.

    Again, my criticism of you has remained the only topic, and it has remained fully justified.

    (Forgive me if there’s a delay in explaining this again, I’m going to go read a book for a while so I will not be checking my notifications for a bit.)

    • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Your comment and logic falls flat when, in another thread, you’ve been speaking with me about the topic at hand without deviating into this cyclical psychoanalysis you’ve defaulted to where the rules are made up and the points don’t matter. If you dont want to engage on the root topic or the points I made along the way… That’s perfectly fine. That’s your opinion - but don’t tout it as some infallible fact when you can’t even remain consistent on your observations from thread to thread. Enjoy the book.