Odd. I see some examples of “ah yes, men always do just this” peppering the discussion. And if somone comments on the tone of it? We get some pretty harsh reaponses. Quite a bit of duality, don’t you think?
playing coy like this just makes you look like a redditor.
Insulting me for making an observation doesn’t strengthen your argument.
If you are going out of your way to make that your focal point… and avoiding the topics at hand you’re clearly out of your depth and flailing. But that was apparent when you defaulted to… Well… what youre doing again, hah.
… Or hey maybe you just sent the reply before getting to the actual discussion points? I eagerly await the rest of your post where you refute the actual talking points I made.
Nah, honestly I just didn’t engage with the rest of what you said because you demonstrated that you were going to take very mild criticism of your transparent behavior as a harsh personal insult.
If you’re really looking forward to it, I’d ask you to go and tally up the number of people saying “yes, all men are like this” compared to the commenters like yourself that are rejecting both the entire premise as even conceptually valid along with the possibility of this being based on an experience. Thus far, and I admit it’s a cursory reading, I have found no comments saying “yes, all men behave like this” and whole lot of comments saying things along the line of “I have had this experience and it is a common one for women to have, [some] men do behave like this”.
The pushback you’re getting is because of your behavior, not just because of your position.
Nah, honestly I just didn’t engage with the rest of what you said because you demonstrated that you were going to take very mild criticism of your transparent behavior as a harsh personal insult.
Let me ask a question: by your opinion (self evident, but let’s play this out) what is your take on redditors? Positive? Negative? Even if the word/description weren’t in my vocabulary… I could clearly tell how you meant it. I responded to that behavior. It did amuse me when that became the focal point of the discussion.
commenters like yourself that are rejecting both the entire premise as even conceptually valid along with the possibility of this being based on an experience.
Boy howdy - you are extremely off the mark. In several places I made both an assertion that the artist could have had some bad luck with relationships (implying it surely could happen and may well have) … and that while it may not have been the artists intent: The response in the last panel implies that it is the norm. My issue lies there - as covered in other responses.
The pushback you’re getting is because of your behavior, not just because of your position.
My behavior? Like actually reading a post and responding? Ghastly actions indeed.
The discussion is worth having (my opinion) …and I’ll remind you that I’ve at least paid you the courtesy of reading your responses and replying to them.
Sorry, could you clarify what your point is?
In the game Bingo, when a player fills a row (or whatever the set goal is) they have won and have to call out “Bingo!” to signal to the other players.
I’m familiar with the game. I’m more looking for clarification on the collection of words you’d assembled there and how they related to the OP.
You appear to have been implying some sort of correlation?
Everyone here understands what they meant. If you wanna criticize just do it, playing coy like this just makes you look like a redditor.
Odd. I see some examples of “ah yes, men always do just this” peppering the discussion. And if somone comments on the tone of it? We get some pretty harsh reaponses. Quite a bit of duality, don’t you think?
Insulting me for making an observation doesn’t strengthen your argument.
If being called a redditor is what you think of as “harsh” you need to go back to reddit, you’ll never survive here.
If you are going out of your way to make that your focal point… and avoiding the topics at hand you’re clearly out of your depth and flailing. But that was apparent when you defaulted to… Well… what youre doing again, hah.
… Or hey maybe you just sent the reply before getting to the actual discussion points? I eagerly await the rest of your post where you refute the actual talking points I made.
Nah, honestly I just didn’t engage with the rest of what you said because you demonstrated that you were going to take very mild criticism of your transparent behavior as a harsh personal insult.
If you’re really looking forward to it, I’d ask you to go and tally up the number of people saying “yes, all men are like this” compared to the commenters like yourself that are rejecting both the entire premise as even conceptually valid along with the possibility of this being based on an experience. Thus far, and I admit it’s a cursory reading, I have found no comments saying “yes, all men behave like this” and whole lot of comments saying things along the line of “I have had this experience and it is a common one for women to have, [some] men do behave like this”.
The pushback you’re getting is because of your behavior, not just because of your position.
Let me ask a question: by your opinion (self evident, but let’s play this out) what is your take on redditors? Positive? Negative? Even if the word/description weren’t in my vocabulary… I could clearly tell how you meant it. I responded to that behavior. It did amuse me when that became the focal point of the discussion.
Boy howdy - you are extremely off the mark. In several places I made both an assertion that the artist could have had some bad luck with relationships (implying it surely could happen and may well have) … and that while it may not have been the artists intent: The response in the last panel implies that it is the norm. My issue lies there - as covered in other responses.
My behavior? Like actually reading a post and responding? Ghastly actions indeed.
The discussion is worth having (my opinion) …and I’ll remind you that I’ve at least paid you the courtesy of reading your responses and replying to them.