• karashta@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Gotta create artificial scarcity if there’s not any real scarcity or the plebs might start thinking

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      artificial scarcity

      From the article:

      This implies that Nvidia cannot get enough GDDR7 memory to produce GPUs at its current rate. Alternatively, it implies that Nvidia expects significantly reduced GPU sales in 2026, possibly due to rising NAND and DRAM costs and their impact on PC prices.

      That seems a lot more plausible to me than Nvidia trying to intentionally constrain GPU supplies. They just need to expect that the memory shortage will affect their gaming sales. We know that there is a massive RAM shortage. I mean, you don’t need to introduce other factors to explain that move.

      On a similar note, I’ve seen articles talking about how PC vendors expect revenue to drop drastically in the near term (since they’ll have to hike prices because of the RAM constraints driving up their RAM costs, which in turn will price some consumers out of the market, which will reduce their sales until more supply of RAM relative to demand becomes available). I haven’t seen anything about them cutting production, but I would expect them to do so; otherwise they’d just build up a bunch of computers that won’t sell.

      And I’d bet that there are other companies that will be impacted, all kinds of things that one might not think of as computer vendors that use memory in their devices and suddenly need to hike prices and expect to see sales impacted.

      • CubitOom@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        They could release the same 2025 number of GPUs and still not have enough to meet the 2026 demands. Nvidia has been not making enough to meet demand for a while now.

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    The article is all speculation about RAM availability, but somehow doesn’t even mention AI.

    My comment is speculation too, but Nvidia almost certainly has one of the most reliable supplies of RAM. This would suggest they’re doing the obvious thing and putting their supply in enterprise AI products, while leaving the gaming community (who they owe their success to) fighting for price-gouged scraps.

    • CameronDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      They owe their start to the gaming community, but their success has largely been off the back of being first to “sell shovels” for crypto and AI.

      They’ve kinda outgrown us sadly. I kinda wonder if they’ll spin out the GPU business one day.

    • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Alternatively, they see the writing on the wall and are pre-emptively raising GPU prices so they better weather the crash.

      Alt: the money they helped launder through LLM firms for criminal orgs who started crypto farms is finally running out.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      the downfall of the us empire, imagine that.

      i’m morbidly curious about what will happen when the bubble bursts.