• Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because AI is a disruptive technology we should require 40% of gross profits be put into a fund to address its negative externalities.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Joke’s on you.

      They don’t actually make any money. Not unless their a monopoly that’s captured regulators anyway.

    • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Better yet: nationalize the AI companies. Make AI like water supply or fire service - a public utility. My government is VERY far from perfect, but even a country with any semblance of democracy has a better chance of making AI safe and useful to all than a greedy corporation. That way the training data and model parameters can be opened to public scrutiny.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I definitely want my complete incorruptible government to be in charge of the training and maintenance of the national knowledge repository, this sounds like a great idea with no chance of negative results.

        At least Google just wants to steal and sell your data. Trump actively wants you to suffer.