• Pup Biru@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    i’d say it’s less that it’s inadequate, and more that it’s complex

    for a small team, build a monolith and don’t worry

    for a medium team, you’ll want to split your code into discreet parts (libraries shared across different parts of your codebase, services with discreet test boundaries, etc)… but you still need coordination of changes across all those things, and team members will probably be touching every part of the codebase at some point

    for large teams, you want to take those discreet parts and make them fairly independent, and able to be managed separately: different languages, different deployment patterns, different test frameworks, heck even different infrastructure

    a monorepo is a shit version of real, robust tooling in many categories… it’s quick to setup, and allows you a path to easily change to better tooling when it’s needed