Press secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed the apparent war crime was legal even as she said Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth knew nothing about it.

The White House on Monday shifted the blame for killing the survivors of a U.S. military strike on an alleged drug smuggling boat from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and onto the commanding admiral.

Killing survivors of a destroyed vessel is literally an example of a war crime in the U.S. Department of Defense Law of War Manual. “For example, orders to fire upon the shipwrecked would be clearly illegal,” the manual reads.

Press secretary Karoline Leavitt, nevertheless, repeatedly stated that it was legal – even as she further claimed, as Donald Trump did Sunday, that Hegseth was unaware that it had happened.

    • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      That’s like what my understanding of fubar was, face unrecognizable, belay any response.

      Thanks Dad.

      Combined with a pretty bad case of face blindness led me to telling a fellow classmate a professor was “fubar” in public…

      • ジン@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I’m confused—I thought that acronym was ‘fudged up beyond any repair’? I also don’t get ‘belay any response’. Does this mean to ‘remain unresponsive’? The confusion here being that belay means to halt essentially—so the word choice doesn’t make intuitive sense to me.

        If this was all just a setup for the joke, apologies for the technicalities

        • NABDad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Your understanding of the term, assuming you replaced “fucked” with “fudged”, is correct. The explanation given by the father was a lie to avoid teaching curse words to a child.

        • xorollo@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          I think it works as instructions on how to face Cthulhu. Or maybe explains deer reacting to headlights.

          Edit: I was reading ‘face’ as a verb as in 'to confront", instructing you to face the unrecognizable.

          On the other hand I guess it could be a suggestion that you hide any recognizable facial responses to something.