• IonTempted@lemmynsfw.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Weren’t there like Blu-Rays? I guess the first movie I watched was Avengers (2012) and it really didn’t blew me away

    Nowadays I watch movies with my Quest 2 on the big screen app and think, holy shit

    • remotelove@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      The media (Blu-ray, dvd, whatever…) didn’t matter so much. Adding depth fields to existing media works, but it isn’t exactly perfect. The tech should be much better now, but it took a fuck ton of manual labor to convert films to be compatible with 3D. Back when 3D TVs were being pushed, studios had to film movies in 3D as well, which took more time and more equipment.

      Here is an old pic I took during the conversion of Titanic into 3D since it wasn’t filmed in 3D from the start. Each frame needed to have depth fields mapped, by hand, in a room filled with jr level staff. This work was split across multiple studios.

    • rafoix@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yes, you needed a 3D disk player, 3D TV, 3D version of whatever you want to watch. That’s a lot of upfront costs.

      Very few movies are filmed in 3D. Avatar did it right but almost nothing else did and it shows.

      Video games should be doing it right now on PC but most folks would rather use all the extra horsepower to run their games at 200fps.

        • rafoix@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          VR seems a lot more isolating than 3D glasses in front of a TV. Even the powered active 3D glasses are a lot less cumbersome than any VR headset.

          I absolutely wish that someone made a 3D TV with the New 3DS technology in 4K. Have the 3D effect turn off when more than one person is watching TV.