• 3 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 7 days ago
cake
Cake day: November 22nd, 2025

help-circle

  • I knew there had to be some truth to the “have you tried rebooting” trope…

    I was mentally prepared for anything at this late a time on a Friday when all I wanted to do is to grab some sweet Linux ISOs to enjoy. So I explained every single step that I had taken, described every piece of hardware and exposed any and all quirky software that I had turned off for the final speed test. They were extremely polite and kind when they said, “you are exactly right, sir, the ports on your ONT can only deliver 100 Mbit/s. We’re getting you a new one.”

    I was so goddamn relieved.


  • Thanks for sharing! I was also surprised and even tried to “provoke” an explanation as to why it wasn’t changed a long time ago, or at the very least, why they allowed me to electronically sign a contract that they would not be able to live up to…

    And your story reminded me, that I really should try to remember to tell the technician that they are sending out sometime next week to check my cables! I’d hate for them to leave me a gigabit ONT with who know what ancient category Ethernet cables in my walls…










  • Thanks! I’m doing this on Linux, which I failed to mention in the post. I terminated the program with ctrl + c, but it was still interesting to me how such a short, seemingly uncomplicated snippet could tax my Ryzen 7 5800 X3D so much that the fans needed to increase their speed. Couldn’t a malicious actor theoretically disrupt a target machine by having an unnoticeably insignificant program loop in the background, taxing the CPU to it’s usable limits? This is off topic of course, but still interesting.