Am I just deceived? I think I might love him?

  • Klear@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’re nothing but a skinner box that’s supposed to keep you playing games for longer. It’s the same type of instant gratification built into most mobile game, but applied to everything else.

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      In a system where you pay once for the game, isn’t that a good thing? It lets you enjoy the game for longer instead of making you constantly buy new games, thus spending less money for the same amount of enjoyment.

      • Klear@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s meant to keep you playing after you stop enjoying said game. Besides, pay once? Shit like this is very often paired with the free-to-play and microstransactions model.

        • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I really dont think its that bad. I can see the argument that they should be able to be disabled for people with OCD or something. I used to feel some kind of FOMO for not 100% every game.

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Right, that’s a fair criticism with regards to microtransactions. I don’t know much about those kinds of games though, so I can’t really say much about it.

          My partner bought Skyrim twice (Steam and Switch) and 100%'d both, and now is going through the same process with BG3. I’m just thinking about how the achievement system is acting like a multiplier to the game’s value in this instance.