als@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 days agoFFmpeg to Google: Fund Us or Stop Sending Bugsthenewstack.ioexternal-linkmessage-square126fedilinkarrow-up1844arrow-down14cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldfoss@beehaw.orgpulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
arrow-up1840arrow-down1external-linkFFmpeg to Google: Fund Us or Stop Sending Bugsthenewstack.ioals@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square126fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldfoss@beehaw.orgpulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
minus-squareBradleyUffner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoNothing was stolen. The authors choose to give it away, for free, with no strings. That’s not theft. No one forced them to choose that license, and no one forced anyone to contribute to that project.
minus-square0x0@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up3·19 hours ago with no strings. I wouldn’t call the L/GPL “no strings”.
minus-squareBradleyUffner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-219 hours agoTrue. I should have been more specific. No strings in that there should be no expectation of receiving anything in return.
Nothing was stolen. The authors choose to give it away, for free, with no strings. That’s not theft.
No one forced them to choose that license, and no one forced anyone to contribute to that project.
I wouldn’t call the L/GPL “no strings”.
True. I should have been more specific. No strings in that there should be no expectation of receiving anything in return.