The Democrats were furious Monday over eight senators who caved to support a deal to end the government shutdown that does not include the Affordable Care Act subsidies their party had spent weeks fighting for.

The offending lawmakers include Democratic Senators Dick Durbin, Tim Kaine, Jacky Rosen, John Fetterman, Catherine Cortez Masto, Maggie Hassan, Jeanne Shaheen, and independent Senator Angus King, who claimed that they’d ensured a Senate vote on extending the tax credits. Their capitulation comes after House Speaker Mike Johnson insisted for weeks that he wouldn’t promise them a vote on anything, and even if he does follow through with a vote, it’s unlikely such a measure will pass the House.

Democratic lawmakers slammed their colleagues for forfeiting health care coverage for an estimated 5.1 million Americans by 2034 and increasing premiums across the marketplace.

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders railed against the deal while speaking before the Senate Sunday. “If this vote succeeds, over 20 million Americans are gonna see at least a doubling in their premiums in the Affordable Care Act,” he said. “For certain groups of people, it will be a tripling and a quadrupling of their premiums. There are people who will now be paying 50 percent of their limited incomes for health care. Does anybody in the world think that makes sense?”

  • ieatpwns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Are you implying I don’t already need the affordable care act? Because I do. They acted like they wouldn’t fucking cave for 40 days then these 8 go and say meh fuck it who cares. wtf was it all for then?

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      You can say the same about every lost fight. With that mentality, nobody would ever fight for the right thing. Obviously it was an attempt to save ACA, then these 8 jumped ship, probably claiming the pain threshold had become too high.
      It sucks, but you can’t say the fight didn’t have to be fought.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      The sunk-cost fallacy isn’t a winning argument, here. But the goal of protecting healthcare for regular people is a strong enough goal that it doesn’t need sunk-cost. These 8 could have protected their people but jammed-out.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        They’re saying that the fact that they folded makes all the harm of the last 40 days meaningless. These 8 motherfuckers waited until extra harm had been done before signing off on the harm caused by getting the ACA.

        This outcome is the worst possible. If they’d been spineless 6 weeks ago they’d still be traitors, but this is somehow even worse.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          They basically treated it like every U.S involved conflict in recent history.

          Commit tons of resources, suffer massive casualties, give up and go home declaring an empty victory.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          They’re saying that the fact that they folded makes all the harm of the last 40 days meaningless.

          Oh come on! It wasn’t meaningless! It was a cynical con to get votes that they abandoned as soon as the election was over!