• LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Its a cool truck IF you dont need to tow anything.

    But a LOT of contractors tow trailers. Building supply trailers, tool trailers, heavy equipment trailers, air compressor trailers and then on the weekend pulling holiday trailers, boat trailers and sometimes car trailers or moving trailers - there’s a lot of things that get pulled by pickups - and they royally suck for range once you’re pulling. Range drops very dramatically.

    Its one thing to pull into a gas station and refuel but MOST charging stations aren’t even set up as pull throughs, so a trailer is a major pain in the butt. The entire point of a new ‘tool’ like the Lightning is to make your life easier and more convenient, not less.

    I will say though, that the new Silverado EV has surprisingly long range for an EV. Reportedly up to 800 km with no load and even at half range, 400 km while towing is still usable, not outstanding, but usable.

      • LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        There are multiple *reputable *car and truck magazines that say range of the F150 Lightning drops in half while towing. https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/ford-f150-lightning-electric-truck-towing-test

        MotorTrend real world range with no trailer: 255 miles.

        Range with light, medium and heavy trailer: 115, 100 and 90 miles.

        BIG range killer. Heavy trailer kills range to almost 1/3 of unloaded range.

        The Lightning is particularly bad for towing.

        • Slevin06@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I deleted my previous reply as I did not properly read the article you linked. Motortrend briefly touch on the point that the Aging Wheels video goes into much more depth on. That it is aerodynamic efficiency, not weight that has the significant impact on range. This is an important distinction. Tools, construction materials, etc. weigh what they weigh, altering that variable to a significant degree is not really a feasable proposal and does rule out electric vehicles in general for viable long distance towing if this was the major impacting factor. Improving aerodynamic efficiency of heavy towed loads as a major impacting factor however is a much more viable strategy.

          I think a more accurate criticism is that electric vehicles are a poor choice for towing aerodynamicly inefficient loads long distance, as whilst the efficiency loss impacts all vehicle types, the energy carrying capacity and recharge times of many current electric vehicles make them a worse choice.

          • LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            That seems like a lot of words to say EV trucks suck at towing especially the Lightning.

            The very nature of almost all trailers is that they dont have great aerodynamics, especially holiday trailers, a primary reason why people buy a pickup truck.

            • Slevin06@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              That doesn’t mean that it is financially unviable to improve tailers, to the benefit of both gas and electric vehicles. With the advent of Airshaper, CFD is commercially viable for trailer companies R&D if there is demand.

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Shocker. An even heavier and more expensive version of their already massive and expensive road tank isn’t selling.

  • Cnkcv@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m kind of surprised. Every contractor I know who has them, loves them, saves them a ton of money.

  • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’d love one, except I live in an apartment, it wouldn’t fit in my garage, it makes no sense to own one in the city, and I’m lucky to pay rent these days much less pay it again for a truck I have nowhere to put and nowhere to use.

    All this is why I got a used Fiesta instead.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      An EV Fiesta (or Escort or Focus) would fill the needs of a vastly undeserved segment of the population.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      conservatives arnt exactly the brightest bunch when it comes to purchasing. on the hindsight, this is why byd was made 100% so us companies can charge overpriced cars.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Well that’s not surprising given the fact that the vehicle is completely unusable outside of North America.