Sure seems that way if you, as you claim, keep track of people’s voting behaviour and the content of their posts to find things that you deem contradictory. 🤷
Still don’t know what point you’re trying to get across. Do you feel morally righteous by pointing out that people hold opinions that are not 100% reflected in their actions? Do you get a mega boner by pointing out that people are not infallible and are human, and that it is human to err?
Congratulations, you have rediscovered that people make mistakes and thus their actions do not always perfectly align with their convictions.
That doesn’t make them a hypocrite, it makes them human.
It isn’t as if these individuals are purposely endorsing AI imagery, more that they have simply failed to spot it as such. With how these algorithms are advancing, it is becoming more difficult for the casual user.
Your little strawman is creating a character where you get to assign the intent behind its actions as you wish to have it support your argument and then claiming it is representative of all users. No one is falling for it.
Not a problem. Not many folks are aware voting is public.
OP & I are just more self-conscious when we use public networks. Have a happy Cop30!
Ah so what you’re saying is you’re obsessed with this, possibly to an unhealthy extent, and you stalk people. Got it.
Why would I obsess over hypocrisy?
Isn’t normal people live hypocritical lives?
I don’t know why you would obsess over this, you’ll have to figure that out for yourself, sorry.
I am not?🤷♀️
Sure seems that way if you, as you claim, keep track of people’s voting behaviour and the content of their posts to find things that you deem contradictory. 🤷
That’s just normal social media usage.
I’m a big fan of /c/thisyou?
What about you? Do you use the threadiverse sparingly?CX
I have bad news for you: it is not.
You also seem to have trouble staying on topic. Concerning, maybe. Never heard of “the threadiverse parsley” and I suspect I don’t care.
How do you know this?
Reading this thread we both engaged in, reads like projection on your part. But honestly doesn’t matter. Hope you do a little introspection today!
Still don’t know what point you’re trying to get across. Do you feel morally righteous by pointing out that people hold opinions that are not 100% reflected in their actions? Do you get a mega boner by pointing out that people are not infallible and are human, and that it is human to err?
You bring nothing of value to this conversation.
Is this about yourself?
Lumidaub asked a question, and I answered. Nothing more to this.
You didn’t answer their question at all.
The “anti-ai” threadiverse users are still using the threadiverse to upvote ai content.
Unless you’re not aware of the idiom.
Congratulations, you have rediscovered that people make mistakes and thus their actions do not always perfectly align with their convictions.
That doesn’t make them a hypocrite, it makes them human.
It isn’t as if these individuals are purposely endorsing AI imagery, more that they have simply failed to spot it as such. With how these algorithms are advancing, it is becoming more difficult for the casual user.
Your little strawman is creating a character where you get to assign the intent behind its actions as you wish to have it support your argument and then claiming it is representative of all users. No one is falling for it.
Do you know what an apology is?