• brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Literally all I’m saying is that more expensive doesn’t always mean better quality. That’s literally it

    You are right, more expensive doesn’t always mean better quality or more products that’s why I am referring to assets made with these money that show that in this case spending 10x more than everyone else is resulting in a bigger and more advanced army

    • Are_Euclidding_Me [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      in this case spending 10x more than everyone else is resulting in a bigger and more advanced army

      This is the part I think you haven’t shown, even a little bit. First you linked a wikipedia page which was a list of countries with the highest military expenditures, then you linked wikipedia pages for a bunch of american military hardware. At no point did you try to compare american military hardware with Russian military hardware, either in quantity or quality. The only comparison you’ve made is in terms of expense.

      • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s not that hard you can compare it yourself, google how many military assets russia have. USA spend a trillion in war each year and as a result they have almost a thousand operative fifth generation planes (for comparison russia has less than 25). USA has about 70 nuclear submarines where russia has 20

        • m532@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Russia has hypersonic nukes, usa doesn’t. It doesn’t matter how much you spend, if you get hypersonic nuked you are dead.