*Their bids were so much lower than competitors, they received just 8% of the state’s $826 million in federal BEAD funding. The state awarded just over half of its federal funds. *
Satellite internet companies dominated Colorado’s revised broadband plan that aims to finally get the rest of the state’s households online and up to modern-day internet speeds, the Colorado Broadband Office announced late Friday.
Amazon’s upcoming Project Kuiper and Space X’s Starlink satellite services bid on pretty much every eligible location for a chance to qualify for some part of the state’s $826.5 million allocation as part of the federal Broadband, Equity, Access and Deployment, or BEAD program.
The LEOs, short for low earth orbit services, won 50% of the state’s approximately 90,000 eligible locations of homes and buildings deemed to have no internet or subpar speeds of less than 100 mbps down, and 20 mbps up.
Public comments on the preliminary winners will be accepted until Aug. 29 at 11:59 p.m. After that, the state sends its final plan off to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration by Sept. 4. They’ll have 90 days to review and approve plans.
“I want to celebrate being able to serve more locations with BEAD funding,” said Brandy Reitter, executive director of the Colorado Broadband Office. “Amazon is now part of our broadband ecosystem and we’ll welcome them. … I think Amazon has a lot to prove so I’m looking forward to them delivering on their commitment.”
Originally, the $42 billion BEAD program, which Congress approved in 2021 as part of the Infrastructure Act, prioritized fiber technology because many considered it to be the fastest and most future proof. But it is also the most expensive.
In June, the Trump administration made every state and territory redo their BEAD programs, even in cases where awards were already announced to internet providers. States had to keep technology neutral and pick the lowest cost options.
The LEOs were primarily picked because they could do it much cheaper than everyone else, Reitter said.
How about, let’s nationalize all utilities
We just did, you’re now required to have Star link Internet as the criteria for what the government support has beEn rewritten so only satillite service can qualify. Elon musk now owns your connection to the world. You may experience difficulty connecting to some web domains and your homepage has been preselected for you. Your monthly history will be reviewed and unpatriotic web usage will result in detainment or deportation.
Congratulations on your Freedom!
Community owned, not nationalized.
I’m very happy with my community owned ISP (fiber to every house in my town)
Aughhhh
Verizon and Comcast clearly aren’t doing it, so, Starlink it is!
Just don’t transmit anything on them against Musk/Bezos or their corporations or their actions or their speech and you’ll be fine.
Publically funded internet has worked so well in the past…
Could not disagree more. I beg you to find a community in CO that doesn’t love their public ISP.
Legitimately, yes, when it’s not being hamstrung by anticompetitive lawsuits from Telco lobbyists.
CO is probably the right place for LEO internet. Difficult to bury, difficult to string poles, difficult to build terrestrial wireless due to various issues including no LOS.
If you have power, you can have internet. Power was figured out in the 30’s even in the remote regions, internet should be no different.
A lot of my neighbors are off grid, but you make a really good point.
Depends. Colorado has half a state of flat plains, then some mountain ranges, high plains, some mountain ranges, and some desert. Cities and towns are cities and towns. In any given area, they already have utilities strung for power, phone, cable. They’re just cities and towns. The front range is just big cities and highways like anywhere. Several cities in the state have muni fiber. (AT&T cellular is terrible universally though. Somehow Verizon and even T-Mobile work better.)
Satellite makes sense for those people in rural homes on mountains that no longer can purchase homeowners insurance in many areas because climate change fire risk is too great. So limited market. But, they could also just beam a 2Gbps P2P radio link from a town with fiber because line of sight from a mountain is forever, so…
LOS is hard when there are trees. Not as hard when you just need to point straight up.
Last part is kinda my point. Wouldn’t it be cheaper and better to just do wireless ground connection?
Geographically, absolutely true. The real question is what the Terms of Service will look like, and if oversight is going to be strong enough. LEO satellites are only the most economical solution if the provider doesn’t artificially inflate prices.
Given LEO stuff have recurring costs every X years they need to be relaunched, I’d hope it would have rules like, you need to maintain it for 50 years or some long time frame.
It’s cool if they win some money and putting new satellites up is part of the ongoing funding, but I don’t want them getting another award 5 years from now for the same spot, given fiber wouldn’t.
I hadn’t even thought of that. I was more concerned about them offering a basic slow tier that is “up to 100 Mbps” but is really dial up speed, or getting sites and services to fork over money for preferential treatment.
They found a way to get landline fiberoptic to work.
Inb4 they pretty much don’t do a fucking thing, and we start seeing commercials and public perception about how bad and fake this whole “government internet” thing is
Isn’t part of the plan to get Starkink everywhere possible so they can throttle information or cut it off? More control essentially and more money for the nazi muskrat.
Maybe in other countries, but in the USA they could just cut the fiber off as well.
Not sure how relevant that risk is inside America.
