• Sirence@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t follow. Most guardianship decisions are made without a judge involved. A judge is involved when the parents cannot come to an agreement between themselves. The way things are now many fathers are foregoing raising their children because from a financial standpoint it would be nonsense. If a father earns double that what the mother earns it is financially unwise to split guardianship 50/50 and finance plays an incredibly big role in raising children as money enables your child to pursue better education etc.

    • monogram@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      My bulletpoint is about guardianship laws, how when there is a guardianship dispute the default is always on the mother, even when it makes no sense financially or for the psychological health of the child

      • Sirence@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes but we both want the same thing I think, equal opportunity to raise ones children independent of ones gender. And feminism would help move that goal closer, so I don’t understand what you are trying to argue. The default should be 50/50, that’s equality.

        • monogram@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I call that gender equality you call it feminism, but yeah we’re on the same page.