• CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    yeah, yummy meat. I like it a lot. Sometimes i salt it than dry it myself, and god, does it taste delicious. I might be bothered by the cruelty of all this meat industry, but guess what, if i were to choose, i’d rather be a farm pig. Anything actually that does not comprehend the cruelty of this reality, and i’m not talking about farms here. Also, unlike most of us they go away quickly.

    P.S. fyi, latest studies show that plants might also feel the pain. Sorry to disappoint you guys, but it seems like we are just doomed to bring more suffering in this world. You better find a way to cope with this before it became more researched.

      • CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        good point. i don’t kill them though, silly, there are people to do it for me.

        Also, unlike us, animals eat literal grass which does not require all kinds of fossil fuel machines, tons of earth-polluting pesticides, you know, stuff like that. Also we don’t need to exterminate trees in order to be able to herd them, you know, that long things sticking up from the ground, producing oxygen, green all the spring, summer, and even autumn, unlike wheat and stuff.

        • ambiguous_yelp@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          First of all, humans are animals, the term you’re looking for is non-human animal. Secondly, grass fed is a myth, theyre fattened up on corn and soy all the same, you should know that the vast majority of deforestation ; the vast majority of monocropping, is done to sustain animal agriculture

            • ambiguous_yelp@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Theres a reason thats not common, its way more expensive and less efficient in terms of land use, also you might think of grassy fields as being super sustainable but theyre not a natural ecosystem, theyre a monocrop like any other where shrubland or forests have to give way to grazing fields, in the uk where I’m from the majority of our land is dedicated to these kind of fields already and its decimated our natural forests. There is no world in which feeding cows pigs chickens and sheep on grass only including finished feed reduces land use it would increase it. J.poore 2017, a comprehensive metastudy on land use and emissions of the global food sector found that a global transition to plant based diets would lead to a 70% reduction in land use, they looked at thousands upon thousands of farms accross the world yes including “grass fed” farms

                • ambiguous_yelp@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  It remains the case that the majority of farmland is for animal agriculture, and grazing only on grass would increase land use not decrease it, as it stands the vast majority of murdered farm animals are fattened up on soy and corn feed. Suggesting that the most environmentally sound thing to do is to just feed them all grass something which we physically don’t have the land for is ridiculous

    • threeduck@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You should try dog if you get the chance, Elwood dog farm has a low impact factory farm where you can buy Labrador cuts and some gamier breeds if they’re in stock.

      • linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        i know u are saying that because u think that would be bad but there is literally nothing wrong with eating dogs, also cats are good too.

        • threeduck@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Great, so we agree no animals are ethically off limits to kill and consume. How about… Some of the more simple minded human populace? Like, if through IQ testing we find the bottom 5% of humans, and (without eating brain and spine, avoiding prion diseases) feed them to the masses? They’re probably not terribly much smarter than dogs, and they could help curb food shortages. Or are humans off limits?

          • untorquer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Don’t bring your eugenicist ideas into my human meat market. As long as they’re fed a healthy corn based diet it’s fine.

          • Nikki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            there are genuine health issues with cannibalism unlike dogs and cats, bet we taste good too given the right seasonings tho

            • threeduck@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Only if you eat the brain or spinal column, which I was careful to add. Otherwise the risks are as manageable as with cow meat, i.e., parasites and bacteria. Given that you’re okay with eating cats and dogs, and now simple-minded humans, what’s to stop me from killing and eating you? I mean, all anyone needs to assert is that they’re mentally superior to their food, what’s off the table for you?

              I’m sure mass scale cannibalism might actually be as good for the environment as a plant based diet. Maybe you’re on to something. We’d be so morally consistent!

              • Nikki@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                go ahead a good third of my country thinks i shouldn’t exist anyway and im sick of fighting it, im sure i taste good too

                you keep trying to push people into corners about this when most ppl who eat meat do it simply because it tastes good, has good nutritional value, and is easily accessible. for my two cents in w serious manor, the meat industry is fucked up and should be regulated, since you didn’t take my initial comment as the shitpost it is

                there are moral concerns but for most people (majority will never even know what lemmy is) simply don’t care and will never care, because meat tastes good

                • threeduck@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Pushing people into corners is what good debate is about. If people find their refutations are weak enough to have them back into a corner, then they should abandon that argument.

                  I grew up on a farm in the south of New Zealand. My brothers were dairy farmers, my front yard was cattle, I was a staunch anti-vegan who swore he’d never eat vegetarian as long as he lived.

                  I will never care because meat tastes good. Except now I do.

                  There is no level of regulation that permits - in good moral conscience - the subjugation and slaughter of animals for our pleasure.

                  Meat is only easily accessible because it is heavily subsidized by the government. A vegan diet is nearly always cheaper - consider that most developing nations eat vegan/vegetarian because of this.

                  There’s a short book I read that absolutely convinced me of veganism called “This is Vegan Propaganda and Other Lies The Meat Industry Tells You”. I’ve had 5 people read it, and ALL FIVE have gone vegan. It’s straight up insane how brutal a grip the meat industry has on people, through lobbying, ad campaigns, purposeful obfuscation of the industry. Bananas!