What I don’t get is why it took them decades to figure this out. Why have they been giving us sugar substitutes without understanding what they have been doing to us? Why were these approved for use in the first place?

      • KiwiTB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        No, but I do expect people to assume this is based on humans which it isnt. If this research eventually gets there then we can see what it says, but for now it’s just another click bait article.

    • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Comments like this are ignorant to evolution. Zebrafish are an extremely powerful model for drug development and toxicology.

      • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You are obviously correct.

        Nonetheless, the headline doesn’t even hint at the YEARS of research required before this becomes something people should worry about.

        • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 minutes ago

          What? I’m saying most research translates to humans and therefore people should cut back on sorbitol immediately or risk liver damage. Especially since people have very poor diets and do not maintain healthy gut flora. Are you seriously taking the stance that we should ignore this study and consume sorbitol? You first.

      • KiwiTB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Not at all, I’m just aware that this may not have any relevance to people, and right now it’s little more than click bait fodder.