inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 day agoBoat attack commander says he had to kill 2 survivors because they were still trying to smuggle cocainereason.comexternal-linkmessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up162arrow-down10
arrow-up162arrow-down1external-linkBoat attack commander says he had to kill 2 survivors because they were still trying to smuggle cocainereason.cominclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square41fedilink
minus-squareAssassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up33·1 day agoSmuggling cocaine isn’t a valid defence of the first strike, why would you think it’s a valid reason for the second one? We don’t fucking issue death sentences for trafficking drugs.
minus-squaretym@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·15 hours agoWe don’t. They do. It’s fairly well telegraphed in project 2025. Death penalty for drug dealers is definitely on the roadmap in the US, too. Christianity was a big enough problem without it being usurped by incels.
minus-squareTriumph@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 day agoWe especially don’t issue death sentences for actions taken outside the country, or without trial. Wait, we’re in the upside-down. We especially do issue death sentences in those conditions.
minus-squareAssassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoAren’t they in international waters, anyway? They’re not even under the purview of US law. They can carry as many drugs as they want.
minus-squareIphtashuFitz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 day agoThey still haven’t proven the boat had drugs, or have they?
minus-squareAssassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 day agoHard to do when you’re executing people from 1000 miles away via drone.
minus-squareBrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoHaven’t proven ANY of these boats have had drugs on them. And if they did this is a good way to fight an endless war, by waiting patiently for the grunts to leave the trench and making no advance and gaining no intel.
Smuggling cocaine isn’t a valid defence of the first strike, why would you think it’s a valid reason for the second one?
We don’t fucking issue death sentences for trafficking drugs.
We don’t. They do. It’s fairly well telegraphed in project 2025. Death penalty for drug dealers is definitely on the roadmap in the US, too.
Christianity was a big enough problem without it being usurped by incels.
We especially don’t issue death sentences for actions taken outside the country, or without trial.
Wait, we’re in the upside-down. We especially do issue death sentences in those conditions.
Aren’t they in international waters, anyway? They’re not even under the purview of US law. They can carry as many drugs as they want.
They still haven’t proven the boat had drugs, or have they?
Hard to do when you’re executing people from 1000 miles away via drone.
Haven’t proven ANY of these boats have had drugs on them. And if they did this is a good way to fight an endless war, by waiting patiently for the grunts to leave the trench and making no advance and gaining no intel.