White House ballroom project has become costlier and larger than originally anticipated

Donald Trump encouraged those working on the construction of his new White House ballroom project to disregard traditional permitting, zoning, and code requirements, according to a new report.

Since announcing the project in July, Trump’s ballroom has become larger, costlier and more destructive than initially thought – raising concerns about whether the president is following historical rules when it comes to a White House addition.

The ballroom’s capacity, initially thought to be 650, has been raised to 900. Its cost has nearly doubled from $200 million to $350 million. Its construction, which Trump initially said would not interfere with the integrity of the current White House, has led to the destruction of the East Wing.

  • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    In my fantasy world the next president will blow up the ballroom with literal dynamite, and then install a row of portable toilets near the white house with dump’s stupid fucking face as the toilet seat

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 minutes ago

      I think it should be turned into a homeless shelter.

      You shouldn’t sit in a seat of such power and prestige without being forced to reconcile the most downtrodden and in-need citizens you are serving.

      Anyway, vote for me in in 2028. My platform is, I’m tired of watching you all fuck this up.

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Would be hilarious if the schematics of the ultra secret surveillance hardware in and around the wing get leaked to a foreign party.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    So when this orange despot is gone the whole place will be condemned until it can be proven safe.

  • gezero
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I am confused, what ballroom is this talking about? Do you mean the Epstein ball room? That makes sense…

  • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Look on the bright side; hopefully it’ll catch on fire due to an electric short, or Canada, or something, during one of Trump’s shindigs and him and nine hundred of his “friends” will get trapped inside due to overcrowding and insufficient emergency exits and will burn to death in abject agony.

    • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      9 hours ago

      With an electrical fire in a ballroom full of 900 of Trump’s enablers and the doors fail to open due to corner cutting?

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        One major part of fire code in most areas I’ve ever worked in is that the door access control system must be tied into the fire alarm so an alarm event will kill power to any doors with maglocks. Every door also needs its own exit button to again directly cut power if the automatic motion detector fails to let anyone out. Let’s hope those were the things missed.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Code requirements? Dude those are not just useless regulations. Those are for your safety and the soundness of the building. Only a complete moron signs off on a build that ignores building codes. But here we are.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I expect they’ll probably follow code anyway? Because you know as soon as dipshit is out of there, they’re going to have to inspect that thing for safety reasons. And the contractor probably doesn’t want the reputation of building absolute crap.

      On the other hand, if he’s as good as picking construction contractors as he is at picking lawyers or cabinet positions, well…

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I’m sure it will be built by a contracting company incorporated just for this purpose. And after this, it will be dissolved. They’ll have no reputation to defend.

    • UnspecificGravity@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Seriously. i get ignoring zoning and permitting because fuck everyone else, but skipping CODE requirements just means your building fucking sucks.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I’ve seen what happens when a construction guy gets to build their own buildings out of sight of inspectors. It’s not pretty.

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I think we Canadians would be happy to help with any extensive remodeling your White House requires.

    Maybe you can paint it orange this time.

  • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Yes! Disregard the code! Don’t even think about the building code!

    And don’t worry, the ballroom certainly won’t fall down with you inside it, piggy!

    • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I have never been horny before in my life, on account of being asexual, but the thought of this ballroom collapsing under shitty building practices while housing the top thousand richest bastards in society, is certainly making me feel something hormonal.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Never in your life? I always assumed asexual meant very rarely horny, not literally never. Is that common?

        • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Forty years old, still a virgin. Sex-repulsed. Doesn’t cause a problem in my life. Immune to most advertising. Watching people make the same stupid mistakes about birth control time and time again, and never understanding why. My line ends with me and that’s fine.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          13 hours ago

          It’s a spectrum, but there are people who are literally never horny. It’s not common though.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      15 hours ago

      We should be so lucky.

      It’ll probably collapse on a kindergarten tour group while piggy is in Europe meeting with Putin.