The worst-case scenario is now a possible one: European troops fighting off an invasion largely alone.

It’s by no means clear the Europeans would succeed. Romanian and other European officials at the exercise in Cincu, about 260 kilometers (162 miles) north of Bucharest by road, voiced concerns about how long it would take for NATO allies to make it to the front.

French four-star General Philippe de Montenon said he’s confident Europe could prevail, even without the US on side. “The direction of history is a progressive disengagement of the United States from the European continent,” he said.

archive

  • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    What you miss is that by supporting appeasement to russia, you are the one encouraging more war. Yes russia wants to keep expanding. Putin has said this directly.

    NATO ‘expansion’ is when countries ask to join and then are admitted . Around russia, countries join nato for the defensive pact. If russia doesn’t want countries on their borders banding together to protect themselves from Russian aggression, then they shouldn’t have been so aggressive. Russia has absolutly no right to attack it’s neighbors just because they want to be able to defend themselves.

    Yes, it sucks for the civilians on all sides when Russia attacks. The only solution is for russia to stop attacking - which they could do any day. But they’re a war mongering country, so will only stop when they run out of the ability to attack.