Volodymyr Zelensky, in the next phase of talks to end the war in Ukraine, intends to draw a red line at the most contentious issue on the table: the Russian demand for Ukraine’s sovereign territory. As long as he remains the nation’s president, Zelensky will not agree to give up land in exchange for peace, Ukraine’s chief negotiator, Andriy Yermak, told me today in an exclusive interview.

“Not a single sane person today would sign a document to give up territory,” said Yermak, who has served as Zelensky’s chief of staff, lead negotiator, and closest aide throughout the full-scale war with Russia.

“As long as Zelensky is president, no one should count on us giving up territory. He will not sign away territory,” he told me by telephone from Kyiv. “The constitution prohibits this. Nobody can do that unless they want to go against the Ukrainian constitution and the Ukrainian people.”

https://archive.ph/HaMwP

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Because if they did, EVERY SINGLE country that wants to invade another, including Russia, will know that if they just wait a year everyone will forget about the sovereign land they stole…

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s not simply a bad political decision to give up territory it’s illogical as well.

    The fact that Russia is even engaging in a war with Ukraine indicates that they are duplicitous since they agreed not to attack Ukraine in order to get Ukraine to give up its nuclear weapons.

    Any deal with Russia will be violated as soon as it suits Russia to violate it. Giving up a territory for peace simply gives Russia the opportunity to rebuild their forces, as soon as those forces are rebuilt they will violate the peace treaty. Again.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      agreed not to attack Ukraine in order to get Ukraine to give up its nuclear weapons.

      Russia argues that there was a regime change in 2014 which released them from that agreement.

      • Bazell@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Yeah, in 2014 Ukrainians just got rid of pro-Russian government in Ukraine what, of course, violated the agreement of peace since Russia cannot claim Ukraine peacefully anymore. This is actually totally logical.

      • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Shocking new informartion shows that russia had their fingers crossed behind their backs at the time the deal was made.

  • Aljernon@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Well good for them. Bending knee to Putin won’t secure peace, it’ll only secure them an intermission until Putin can finish the job.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Don’t give up a single meter of land

    Require reparations from Russia

    Demand all children back

    Demand a formal apology for the pain and suffering caused

    Demand Putin in jail through the ICC

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Don’t give up a single meter of land

      By doing what?

      A little tired of hearing this endless “well, if I were Ukraine, I would simply win the war and claim a trillion dollars in reparations and make Russia disappear off the map” Internet wish casting.

      What do you do to extract any of these concessions that hasn’t already been tried? And how many more people are you willing to throw into the meat grinder trying?

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 minute ago

        “How many people are you willing to throw into the meat grinder”

        Yes us lemmy posters are all high ranking Ukrainian officials. Our moral inputs into this site dictate outcomes on the battle field and our opinions hold us accomplice to the slaughter. Putin is not responsible at all; it’s the people posting on the internet!

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        When you post about Ukraine on reddit you get conservative white Americans who have bought the propaganda and think strong, proud, masculine Putin is saving Ukrainian orphans from nazis, and have a mountain of arguments why we shouldn’t fund wars overseas unless it’s Israel, Iraq, Iran or Afghanistan. Or Venezuela of course.

        You post about Ukraine on Lemmy and suddenly every tankie hiding in the shadows can’t take the pressure anymore and HAVE to pile out to whinge about how unwinnable the war is, and that it’s useless to resist a tyrant and invader because something something 21st century capitalism and oil economies and nothing will even change under Putin’s rule anyway so why are we even so worked up and on and on.

        I feel bad for Ukrainian people having to endure not just a hostile invasion but scorn and skepticism from the whole world because some people have such loose, soupy brains that they have invent entire straw-universes to validate the erections they get thinking Putin’s bare chest.

      • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It’s not our decision to make how many people Ukraine is willing to sacrifice for their land. That’s THEIR decision.

        The better question here is how many people is Russia willing to sacrifice for a war of conquest that shouldn’t have happened in the first place.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It’s not our decision to make how many people Ukraine is willing to sacrifice

          It clearly is, or you wouldn’t be telling them the terms for peace.

          The better question here is how many people is Russia willing to sacrifice

          They’re not the ones negotiating loss of territory. You gotta quit this “Well I’m rubber and your glue” line of reasoning.

      • derg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It’s Zelensky that says it, rumor has it Ukraine won’t give up land in exchange for peace

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I know this is mostly a fantasy by now, but in actual reality, Russia obviously needs to give Crimea back to Ukraine and then continue minding its own fucking business.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Has Russia in its various incarnations, ever minded its own business? They’ve been a pain basically since their inception. Mostly because they seem to have predilection for some variation of oppressing their own people and then using those oppressed people to oppress more people.

      There was about a 15-year window when they had a democracy and that’s been it.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        There was about a 15-year window when they had a democracy

        Are you talking about the 90s and early 2000s, when Russia experienced a drop in life expectancy on par with WWII? When foreign capital pillaged the country with the explicit purpose of making an example of them?

        Here’s a link to The Shock Doctrine: Rise of Disaster Capitalism. It helps explain how things got bad enough that Vladimir fucking Putin seems like the lesser evil to the people who lived through it.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    You don’t reward a thief and murderer, you shoot them between the eyes. As a Dutchman, I wholeheartedly support shooting every uniformen Russian or allied you can find. Twice.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      18 hours ago

      In all fairness, I think kost Russian soldiers aren’t there by much choice, Putin loves his meat grinder and has pulled well over a million Russians through it.

      Yes, that is a problem that Russians should fix themselves, but still. Any soldiers surrendering should be treated well. Show them they’ve really been figuring on the wrong side

      • Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They do have a choice. When Russian frontline collapses in WWI, they started to make revolution in the Russia. Soldiers have all the guns, they have a choice, but they don’t use it or care to use it.

      • Aljernon@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Most of the soldiers getting sent into the meat grinder are ethnic minorities from poor regions of Russia. They’re people that European Russians don’t care about.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          putin is less likely to send muscovites or st.petersberg russians(aka white russians) thats where his influence is, if he starts to send those people, the people are going to riot.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      15 hours ago

      You don’t reward a thief and murderer

      We literally do and we do it regularly.

      At this point, telling Russia to give the land back might as well be a land acknowledgement you read in between demanding Florida to back to the Cherokee and telling the Normans to leave England.

      I wholeheartedly support shooting every uniformen Russian or allied you can find.

      Well, quit wasting your time. Get down to Ukraine and win the war, then.

  • That Weird Vegan she/her@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If they give up land now, it gives Pootin permission to do it again and take even more land. Eventually they’ll take all of the Ukraine.

    Also, remember when dumpy mcshitpants said he’d have both wars over in the first 24 hours of office? how long has it been now?

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That’s exactly how they ended up in a situation. Putin took Crimea with basically no resistance. He just didn’t count on Zelensky. Most other leaders would have given in to the pressure and let Putin overrun Ukraine (for a nice golden parachute).

      • Aljernon@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah, historically Ukrainian corruption while not as bad as in Russia was just as pervasive and Putin didn’t really think Zelensky or any Ukrainian leadership would act on principles. Of course, it’s an easy mistake to make when you have no principles and surround yourself with people who have no principles.

    • Rose@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Even if they were to not invade Ukraine again, Putin has been using war to distract the population from domestic problems, so he’d just pick another target after Chechnya, Georgia, Syria, Africa, and Ukraine.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I don’t know how much it would encourage Putin to invade again.

      It’s not like he invaded part of Ukraine and was allowed to keep the annexed territory in the name of peace, then 8 years later invaded again, right?